Church Planting Movements (CPM)

The video below is a great resource in beginning to learn about Church Planting Movements. I'll start this blog with David Watson's bio that I took from his website so you know where he's coming from:

"David Watson serves as the Vice President of Global Church Planting with CityTeam Ministries, San Jose, CA. His primary responsibility is to catalyze Church Planting Movements in difficult to reach cities and countries around the world. The primary methodology used is the training of local leaders in evangelism, discipleship, disciple making, church planting, leadership, church planting strategies and church planting movements. God has used the leaders David trained to start over 40,000 churches in the past 15 years, and more than 2 million people have been baptized as a result of God’s moving in the areas where trained local workers have devoted themselves to God’s work."

www.davidlwatson.org

Highland Oaks Church Planting David Watson - 3/22/2009 from Mike Stahl on Vimeo.

A Responsive Echo

In relation to the previous post I wrote (Cooking Class)...

"An exposition, no matter how true to the text, will die away ineffectively in a vacuum, if there is no possibility of a responsive echo from those who hear it."

Karl Barth

I've recently been focusing my attention on the need for a consistent obedience-based congregational response. In structuring the ministry there is a tendency to overemphasize how much and how to deliver the content. We place high efforts in packaging and deploying the words but we often fail to lay out a framework that encourages, monitors, enables and enhances obedience in the disciple. We toss up the application points and hope that it lands on the fertile surface of their will. Although diligence in teaching and explaining the word of God is key, creating a system or environment that fosters digestion and obedience should have equal consideration and attention.

I've been attempting to place a greater weight on obedience in my community group and I can see that this shift is not an easy one to make. I think by nature consumption is easier than application. Applying God's word takes courage, time, and discipline. It's not easy to bring God's word full circle. I think that's why many of us leaders don't take the time to foster a structure that emphasizes this unpopular half. Environments that expect a response are not popular. Settings that challenge sin or requires accountability don't rank high among the masses. I think that's why we unconsciously default to the easier half of packaging and deploying. It's clean, it's easy and no one gets uncomfortable.

Over the past few years I have been challenged to step back and wait for a response. Instead of filling the void and silence with my own thoughts, jokes, examples and prepared teachings, I've taken a more conscious effort to let the awkwardness ride. To stop compensating for an inactive audience and to start letting the silents reveal our true state. It isn't easy, but its definitely necessary in being a responsible leader... a leader who values the state of the disciple more than his/her popularity.

"Simply to live by the scriptures as you understand them. Simple, but revolutionary."

A.W. Tozer

The Cooking Class

In the book The Shaping of Things to Come, Alan Hirsch and Michael Frost explains the organic rhythm of the biblical church in the book of Acts and observes that...

"The missional-incarnational church...sees itself as part of an ongoing process, not an end itself"

Frost & Hirsch

As subtle as it may appear, many Sunday services function as an endpoint for many churches and believers. If not implemented correctly and in the right time, the Sunday service with its standard format of musical worship, preaching and announcements can act as a counter-productive mechanism in the goal of reproducing disciples. While many churches are able to produce knowledgeable and committed members they often fail to produce disciples who can make another disciple. The mechanics of an average service working as the sole provider of scriptural substance cannot help but create a body of consumers. An example that reveals this distinction is a comparison between a restaurant to a cooking class. In a restaurant, the food is prepared in a kitchen that cannot be seen and is then delivered by well-dressed waiters that present the professionally made food with a smile and polite service. The food is consumed with satisfaction or disgust followed with either compliments or bad reviews to friends and family. A cooking class, however, brings the student into the cooking process. The chef is present and the students watch as the meat is fried and the vegetables are cut. Although the class might be long and within a hotter, messier and less convenient atmosphere, the interactions are stimulating the mind in a different way than in the restaurant. Although the cooking student will finally eat a subpar self-made dish over a tall counter filled with debris and oil, he/she cannot help but think about all the dinners he or she will host with this newfound recipe. While the restaurant satisfies the immediate hunger with speed and culinary excellence, it fails to offer the tools, ingredients, and skills to be able to make that same dish again. The problem that occurs when Sunday services are not coupled with spaces in which the words are discovered in community, is that the student will have no way of knowing how to create that sermon themselves. If the sermon becomes the sole provider of spiritual nourishment, the church member will never know how to cook and will simply become a specialized eater. Although sermons are biblical, sermons that stand alone produces knowledgeable Christians that will only know how to talk about food and compare restaurants.

(insert from a recent essay I wrote)

Recommended books on the topic:

The McDonaldization of the Church (John Drane)

The Shaping of things to Come (Michael Frost & Alan Hirsch)

How to Strategize in a Dynamic Context

I just spotted this on Neil Cole's (author of Organic Church) facebook status and thought I'd weigh in on this idea.

"The best strategic plan is to plan to act strategically when the need arises. Adapt to what comes, don't hold to a plan formed in absentia."

Neil Cole

Although a Pharisee in Jesus' day would have been an obvious example of one who swiftly walks past the evident needs of their community in pursuit of upholding their plans and traditions, I think many leaders in the church, including myself, fail to adjust their strategies in order to stay faithful to the plan. Too much was invested into the program, too many people heard the announcement, how is the board going to react to these changes. The burden of adaptation is heavy, however, static plans can be destructive when the weight of its strategies prevents mobility and flexibility. A.R. Bernard once stated that "change is the essence of maturation", Paul writes that "the man who thinks he knows something does not yet know as he ought to know." (1 Cor. 8:2). The vulnerable position of a teachable student is the sign of a smart and relevant leader. It's funny how we can create strategies that fail to factor in unseen variables. We assume the world functions in a vacuum where good ideas yesterday will surely avail today. Neil raises a great solution to this problem and points us in a direction that requires quick thinking and a trust that God will supply the ideas, resources and plan once the needs arise. It's definitely an uncomfortable method in leading a church, however, I think we'll be giving God a whole lot more glory as a result of it.

How does Neil's quote challenge the way you strategize? Weigh in your thoughts.

Finding the Essence

I think this video is a good introduction into finding the essence of church. The question this entry aims to discuss is...

What are the essential parts of church that a community of believers cannot be without?

The part that stood out to me the most was how Floyd emphasizes the substance within the container rather than the bottle, can or cup itself. In discussing different ways in approaching the harvest I find that our critiques meander on the issues that reside on the surface, the container that merely holds the substance. Some have problems with church buildings while others are offended by calling a house a sanctuary. In finding healthy strategies to building the Kingdom of earth, we need to look deeply into the substance before shaping the container. It's easy to get wrapped up in practicing how you are going to preach a sermon before working through the text in finding out what you're going to say. In the same way, its easy to devote all our time in figuring out how we're going to break up a small group, arrange the spotlights or construct our buildings. We do this all while failing to train leaders in knowing how to lead their groups, missing out on actually being the light to our own communities, and neglecting to build the body of believers that will one day fill those cathedrals (if that's what your into). In some cases, the container influences how the substance grows and matures (which is another blog in and of itself), however, Floyd brings up a good initial point that everyone should consider on their journey in building a healthy church.

Blog Theme

Over the past few years, I have found that a great passion of mine is understanding how the church works. In my desire to communicate the beauty of God's love to the world, I have always found myself deeply immersed into Ecclesiology (the study of churches and its structure). I love it! It just gives me so much joy and satisfaction to figure out ways in which the community of God can influence and transform culture in a loving, fruitful, and self-perpetuating way. This blog exists for the purpose of exposing different thoughts, strategies and methods I have found helpful for my ministry in hopes that it may push us all to think more deeply about why we do what we do. So join in the conversation (funny how that word somehow made its way into everyday Christian lingo), and contribute your comments.

I'll start off this blog with a great quote I read a few years back that has helped defined why the church exists...

"..church doesn't exist for the benefit of its members. It exists to equip its members for the benefit of the world."

Brian D. McLaren
A New Kind of Christian p.155